This post is a response to an article found on the huffingtonpost.com website. Click here to read the article.
If same-sex marriage is good for all, than smoking is good too. Here’s the deal for me….I have no interest in passing on condemnation. We ALL are condemned already. Who of us will escape the doorway of death? But, to argue the value of same-sex relations is ludicrous. Yes, for some, for many, the acts are pleasurable, for them. But, are they beneficial to all? No! These acts are socially destructive, not constructive, and our legislatures have an obligation to uphold the welfare of ALL, not one, not some. This means, each one has the right to live in sin or in Christ Jesus who died for our sin thereby purchasing each of us a resurrection from the dead unto judgment.
This very truth is what protects the liberty of the individual to sin unto the destruction of their-self but that liberty extends to all, for the protection of the nation, which takes procreation to survive. So, while some choose to forgo the natural use of man and woman, others choose to carry on the very liberties which protect their destructive choices. Many choose to do this by utilizing traditional marriage for the good of all.
However, the extension of common entitlements and wages needed to sustain oneself within society must be available to all. Yet, positional acceptance in terms of the gay lifestyle being beneficially good for all, is a position that should remain unsupported, for the natural benefit of the nation.
1. Paragraphs are a good thing.
2. Comparing the loving relationship between two committed partners which is shown to be beneficial to society to smoking which is shown to be detrimental to society is reprehensible.
We are a country ruled by the Constitution, not the Bible. What your book says about gay people is about as valid as what your book says about dietary restrictions.
The Constitutionon of the United States
In disbelief, you may ignore the shed blood of Christ which liberates everyman from the bonds of death unto judgment BUT I by His grace, use that freedom to protect and preserve the rights of all, in light of what is good for all.
I agree with you, there is not, nor should there be, a state religion and neither should we be ruled by religion. But Christ is no religion and where you are building a wall to separate individuals from their Creator, Christ Jesus built a bridge to restore individuals to their Creator. So all, having the Spirit of Christ, stand to protect your personal choice in light of what is good for the Nation.
So, however unnatural your choices are, I stand to protect them in light of what is good for all. This right of mine, to guard the good of all, is clearly expressed and demonstrated in our Constitution.