SoundPosts

RE: The PUN of the Abortion Billboard

As a follow up to the post titled RE: Abortion Billboard and in response to a few comments relating to this story, the issues raised and the PUN used by Greg to “name names”…

@The statement “He’s 35. She’s 18” and what. Should we discriminate based on age?

@The notion of Greg being less than civil by dating a “Teenager” as if that’s a crime. No qualms with sending our teenagers off to war to die for the freedom now used in our speech. So by using what in some social circles is deemed inappropriate (“He’s 35. She’s 18”), though in line with natural law, we attempt to disparage another.

Here’s the thing for me, I do believe in discretion (privacy) as well as ensamples. When to use which seems to be the matter at hand. Does his motives trump his actions? I do not think so. We ought not base charges upon our motives but our actions.

@The “PUN”: so Greg apparently used a pun here to “name names”. But where is the Constitutional violation?

Further, many assume the property is her’s alone. I do not. I contend he has as much right to that child as she does. He has Right of first refusal to father that child. Fatherhood begins when, after birth? That would be unnatural wouldn’t it?

If you take my property for public use (abortion laws), it’s a public matter.

If the child was not aborted, what then. Then he has a right to know. Does he have the right to make assumptive claims publicly. If he were accusing her of breaking the law, when he neither knew if she had or knowing she has not, then yes, that would be a violation of Amendment 4.

Amendment 4 – Search and Seizure. Ratified 12/15/1791.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

for he would be searching out a matter in public, though having probable cause, did not have oath of affirmation.

@The idea of child care “but if she decides to keep the baby, he is fully expected to provide” Bottom line is this…Custody Equals Care. If you have custody of the child then the care for that child is all yours.

Interesting how many will open up to receive a “gift” then demand payment from the giver.

Who should support our children….the one who has custody. Why are they unable, in many cases they have not he means. Why not? Because wages are no longer based upon the individual but upon the collective, the household. There is no liberty in that.

Our Current Solution….keep individuals who do not want to be a family yoked together though finances, visitations, shared parenting, etc. That is wisdom? Why not legalize polygamy. Granted, what we do with our laws is worse than polygamy…we put one away to take another. We trample upon the liberties of one household by extorting them in order to pay for another. It would be much Wiser to pay a living wage whereby the individual was able to individually care for their family. It would be much Wiser to have a social safety net ensuring individual liberty which supports the one who has custody as also having the responsibility of care. Bottom line….

Custody Equals Care

Leaving one individual open to receive another is neither cruel nor unjust, it is liberty. When one departs another, in their departing, they leave the departed with the liberty to live, to legally pursue other relations, to pursue happiness. Their rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness are left intact.

The one who departs suffers no lose of liberty either. In exercising their choice to depart, they have willingly disposed of their personal property which is their Constitutional right.

Webster: Property

4. The exclusive right of possessing, enjoying and disposing of a thing; ownership.

9. Nearness or right.

Here I disclaim all my paternal care,

Propinquity and property of blood.

Amendment 14 – Citizenship Rights. Ratified 7/9/1868. Note History

1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Like This!

Add to: Facebook | Digg | Del.icio.us | Stumbleupon | Reddit | Blinklist | Twitter | Technorati | Yahoo Buzz | Newsvine

Advertisements

About SoundEndurance

I am a follower of The Way, holding to the doctrine of Jesus Christ the first born from among the dead, who lives and reigns forever more. Scripture is the basis of my beliefs which testify of the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead and confirmed in me by His Holy Spirit. The gift of eternal life is inclusive. Jesus shed his blood for all, He has purchased for each of us a resurrection from the dead unto judgment. His shed blood is our justice which satisfies our holy Creator blotting out our sins, making it possible for us to approach a holy, righteous God. In our approach to Him, we repent of our sin, we yield ourselves to His will, wanting to take on His very divine nature, desiring to be made new in His image and likeness thereby doing away with sin. It is through this faith in Him that we become children of God having received His Holy Spirit which does his commandments thereby entering eternal life and escaping the damnation of hell, the lake of fire to come. May we be blessed in the knowledge of Him. Kenneth S. Muratore Jr

Discussion

4 thoughts on “RE: The PUN of the Abortion Billboard

  1. RE: The PUN of the Abortion Billboard SoundEndurance Great goods from you, man. I’ve understand your stuff previous to and you’re just too magnificent. I actually like what you have acquired here, really like what you are stating and the way in which you say it. You make it enjoyable and you still take care of to keep it sensible. I can not wait to read far more RE: The PUN of the Abortion Billboard SoundEndurance again from you. Thanks For Share.

    Posted by garmin nuvi 255w | June 15, 2011, 3:28 PM
  2. RE: The PUN of the Abortion Billboard SoundEndurance Wonderful goods from you, man. I’ve understand your stuff previous to and you’re just too magnificent. I actually like what you have acquired here, really like what you’re saying and the way in which you say it. You make it enjoyable and you still take care of to keep it smart. I can’t wait to read far more RE: The PUN of the Abortion Billboard SoundEndurance again from you. Thanks For Share.

    Posted by garmin nuvi 255w | June 16, 2011, 12:09 PM
    • Thank you for taking the time to read and reply. May the Wisdom of our Creator be our guide. For he is the author of life, liberty and justice for all. May you be blessed and fully rewarded for your diligence in the Truth.

      Posted by SoundEndurance | June 16, 2011, 8:24 PM

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: